Everywhere you look these days governments are finding new ways to tax us – so they can raise money. Now I don’t want to sound cynical, (cannot help myself) but currently they are attempting to tax the air we breath – think carbon dioxide taxation.
So while they are pushing through legislation to accomplish the CDT (carbon dioxide tax), they are at the same time levying taxation on different foodstuffs – all for our own benefit of course!
I guess the argument takes the form of – well if we cannot convince them to eat better, we will just raise tax levels on foodstuffs we consider makes them fat? ill? diabetic? hypertensive? – you name it and we can find a tax to cure it!
Hungary will introduce a fat tax as of September 1 this year -a move the food industry says is unnecessary and ineffective in achieving widespread dietary shifts.
From September 1 Hungarian food manufacturers will have to pay a tax of 10 forint (€0.37) for foods bearing fat, sugar and salt at levels over a certain threshold, something backed by some consumer groups concerned about eating habits that promote the rise of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
The Hungarian government says the tax will raise €70m per year – money which it says will offset public health costs of treating the consequences of high-fat,sugar and salt diets.
While Hungary’s obesity problem is not as big as in countries like the US where the percentage of obese adults exceeds 30%, it sits at around 20% and has been getting worse.
Fat taxes are an idea whose currency has grown in recent years as governments try to share healthcare costs, but the issue is complex as it becomes a moral battle about personal versus industry culpability for dietary intakes and their consequences.
The pan-European food industry body, Food and Drink Europe, opposes fat taxes because it views them as being “discriminatory”.
The group has emphasised that such measures unfairly target particular types of food when it is overall dietary habits that are the problem (the argument that there are no bad foods par se, just bad diets).
It also states that such taxes unfairly prejudice the lower-income sections of society that typically purchase the affected foodstuffs in the greatest numbers.
Other critics of the taxes point to examples like Denmark where obesity rates have risen, like most other developed world nations, despite in its case implementing a tax of high-sugar confectionery in the 1920s.
Denmark fat tax
Denmark introduced a saturated fat tax at the start of the year with the country’s tax ministry calculating that butter prices will rise by 14% under the new tax regime, with margarine up 21% and whipped cream 12%.
The Danish Chamber of Commerce opposed the proposal because of its potential damage to productivity and imports, and the Chamber says the tax could even promote food with more harmful additives as an unwanted consequence.
“The shift from saturated to unsaturated fats may be expected, but it is not necessarily desirable from a health perspective. Some products with unsaturated fats, form more harmful substances when heated to higher temperatures,” it said in a statement.
“Similarly, the effect will be more additives, which does not necessarily increase the health and quality of products.”source
The Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) has already come out against a proposed tax on high fat, sugar and salt (HFFS) foods, stating that it won’t change overweight and obesity levels in Australia.
So folks be prepared THEY in government are eyeing off your foods, with a view to raising even more taxation to pay for their schemes. When you consider how much debt this current Labor government has got us embroiled in…. you can see just why they need to raise taxation levels. Wonder why they have never considered reducing the salaries of parliamentarians – instead of increasing taxation on citizens of the electorate? Oops – pie in the sky stuff me things!
Of course they will say it is for your own benefit – but then most communist / socialist schemes will tell you that!