Last Year – 2009we experienced a (so called) worldwide pandemic of a novel (new) strain of influenza ‘Swine Flu’, which is now talked about by medical authorities as H1N1. There was a rush to get vaccines made and distributed to save lives.
Governments put out suggested figures of possible deaths due to this novel strain – virus, and generally, as they usually do – terrorized the populace into taking the vaccination – to stave off imminent death! Everyone, from the cradle to (almost) the grave was strongly advised to get immunized, not only against the seasonal influenza which strikes each winter, but against the ‘killer’ H1N1 virus as well.
Billions of dollars were spent worldwide, buying the vaccine and filling the coffers of Big Pharmaceutical Companies and their co-conspirators. As an example,GSK Swine Flu sales hit over 835 million pounds and this is only one of the many pharmaceutical companies who attempted to rush through vaccine against the newly identified strain.
The problem was though that there really was no pandemic at all. It seems it was more a case of raise the alarm level, more people will get vaccinated, more profits will be made.
Yes I know that sounds totally cynical; however there is emerging evidence that this is so.
World Health Organization scientists are suspected of accepting secret bribes from vaccine manufacturers to influence the U.N. organization’s H1N1 pandemic declaration, according to Danish and Swedish newspapers.
Meanwhile, pharmaceutical profits from swine-flu-related drugs have soared – with earnings between $10 billion and $15 billion in 2009, investment bank JPMorgan estimates.
A stunning new report reveals that top scientists who convinced the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare H1N1 a global pandemic held close financial ties to the drug companies that profited from the sale of those vaccines.
This report, published in the British Medical Journal, exposes the hidden ties that drove WHO to declare a pandemic, resulting in billions of dollars in profits for vaccine manufacturers.
Several key advisors who urged WHO to declare a pandemic received direct financial compensation from the very same vaccine manufacturers who received a windfall of profits from the pandemic announcement. During all this, WHO refused to disclose any conflicts of interests between its top advisors and the drug companies who would financially benefit from its decisions.
This is all really bad stuff – finding corruption like this in high places, but it seems there is always a need to follow the almighty dollar.
If that were not bad enough, we can also find instances (in Australia) where there are government documents telling medical personnel there is NO NEED to test influenza patients to see if they actually have contracted the H1N1 virus.
During the PROTECT phase of the response to H1N1 influenza 09, laboratory testing of all potential cases is neither required nor desirable. This is because:
• confirmation is no longer required to inform decisions about isolation and quarantine in the community setting, or use of anti-influenza medicines
• the majority of cases, to date, have experienced mild clinical illness
• consumption of laboratory reagent stocks and pressure on laboratory human resources are not sustainable in the face of high levels of laboratory testing.
For clinicians, laboratory testing is only recommended in limited circumstances. Testing should be prioritised for people with influenza like illness who are hospitalised or who die
Now as they (the medical people) do not have to test all patients presenting with influenza type symptoms to see if they have contracted the dreaded Swine Flu – how can they publish accurate figures telling the general public how many cases of Swine Flu there has been in Australia?
According to The Australian: Early in 2009, the WHO predicted the disease would infect up to 2 billion people globally, and in Australia experts were warning many thousands of deaths – up to 10,000 in NSW alone, according to one report – might be expected.
The reality has been somewhat different. To the end of 2009 swine flu caused just 191 deaths in Australia, out of 37,636 confirmed infections, 4992 hospitalisations and 681 admissions to intensive care.
Each of the 191 deaths is still a tragedy for the families involved, but to place it in context, consider what happens every other year from “normal” seasonal flu: an estimated 2000 to 3000 deaths in this country.
So this was the Pandemic we never actually had, which was paid for by your tax dollars and supported by the WHO and some Big Pharmaceutical Companies.
The number of (so called) victims was never truly recorded, and estimates were stated as absolutes! And they call that science!
But don’t please become complacent. The Health Authorities and the Serum Laboratories are working on new, combination vaccines to terrorize you with for the next winter – 2010 Down Under. They have already begun threatening and terrorizing the folks in the USA.
Everyone 6 months and older should get a flu vaccine as soon as vaccine is available this fall. While flu is unpredictable, it’s likely that 2009 H1N1 viruses and regular seasonal viruses will cause illness in the U.S. this flu season. The 2010-2011 flu vaccine will protect against three different flu viruses: an H3N2 virus, an influenza B virus and the H1N1 virus that caused so much illness last season.
Yes CSL had problems with a triple serum vaccine for Australian children in 2009, and it was eventually withdrawn from the market, but don’t be fooled, they will work on producing yet another vaccine which contains the seasonal influenza vaccine as well as the H1N1 vaccine – a combination drug, and we – those foolish enough to take it – will be their guinea pigs. Just like our USA counterparts.
Please be aware that seasonal influenza vaccinations are NOT the “be all and end all” for seniors – those over the age of 65. So why should we be forcing them to take the jab? Can you name a retirement home that does not mandate a seasonal influenza vaccination?
If the main point of the nation’s influenza vaccination program is to reduce deaths from flu, then the program has failed, at least among people over 65.
A growing body of research shows that because our immune systems age, flu vaccines don’t work as well in the elderly – the group of people most likely to die from flu-related causes.
The revelation has been so unsettling that public health officials have not shared the information widely with the public – even though some of the early findings have been a part of the scientific literature for several years now.
Michael Osterholm, who directs the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, Tuesday told a national conference on vaccine research that it’s time to be more open about the flu vaccine and its lack of protection for the elderly.
We are being told to receive a vaccination to save our lives from a pandemic which never happened, and to take a yearly influenza vaccination, which if we are seniors, is of NO BENEFIT to us…….. Can anyone else see a pattern emerging here? More money in the coffers, for (a) Big Pharma, (b) Medical Personnel, (c) Pharmacists et al…… maybe they want to reduce the number of dependent seniors by vaccinating them to death?
Get out in the sunshine, build up a natural immunity to viruses, question everyone who pushes you into a possible vaccination about ALL the ingredients in the drugs they are asking you to take. Learn all you can about your own body and ways to naturally defeat illness.
And lastly present people with facts and information – credible information such as:
A closer examination of the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) figures shows that in 2001, there were only 257 deaths directly attributable to flu, and in only eighteen cases was the flu virus positively identified. Between 1979 and 2002, NCHS data show an average of 1,348 actual flu deaths per year—a mere 5.7% of the “new and improved” estimate.
The article, published in the British Medical Journal, concludes that “If flu is in fact not a major cause of death, [the government’s] public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia and other lung diseases, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited.”
We were told in recent years that there would be so many cases of bird flu that it would stun the world. Those concerns were totally unfounded. Then there was the swine flu panic last year, with the government overbuying the H1N1 vaccine—71 million doses—to the tune of $260 million and promoting it without proper tests. Where is all that valuable medicine now? In the garbage. But the CDC goes on releasing bogus data to amp up the hysteria—an act that would have any private company or individual hauled in for fraud.
The real problem here is that our government has become a full partner with drug companies in the vaccine business. This has led to a crony capitalist environment in which the government can no longer be trusted to tell the truth.
Meanwhile, not a word from the media discussing the real influenza preventative: vitamin D.